PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ATAS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DI PERUSAHAAN: STUDI PUTUSAN PN STABAT NOMOR 210/PID.B/2025/PN.STB

• Bintang Putra Gunawan

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Bunga Widyastuti

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Adinda Gea Karista

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Moch Rifky Aditya Anam

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Wanodya Suvita

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Padillah Koshi

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Aldi Agustiansyah

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

• Luthy Yustika

  Universitas Esa Unggul

  Author

This study aims to analyze criminal liability for the crime of embezzlement in office within the company environment, focusing on the Stabat District Court Decision Number 210/Pid.B/2025/PN.Stb. By using a normative legal approach through a statute approach and a case approach, this study compares the provisions on embezzlement in office between the Old Criminal Code (Articles 372 and 374) with the new regulations in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (New Criminal Code), and examines the application of the elements of the offense, evidence, and the judge's considerations in sentencing the defendant as a company employee who abused the trust of his position. The results of this study indicate that although the Stabat District Court Decision still uses Article 374 of the Old Criminal Code and has successfully proven all elements of embezzlement in office legally and convincingly, there remains quite broad room for interpretation regarding the definition of 'position' for operational-level employees. On the other hand, the New Criminal Code provides a much more modern and flexible formulation through an emphasis on abuse of authority, alternative sanctions, and the priority of recovering victim losses (restitution). This decision is considered to reflect a balance between the principles of legal certainty, justice, and expediency, but still indicates the need to strengthen internal corporate oversight and prepare law enforcement officials for the transition to the New Criminal Code, which will be fully effective in 2026.

Anggalana, A., & Juliansa, M. R. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Debt Collector Di PT. Federal International Finance (FIF) Cabang Lampung. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 7(2), 259–278. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=analisis+yuridis+tindak+pidana+penggelapan+dalam+jabatan+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1750180969107&u=%23p%3DHJZJwrQHZSwJ

Din, M., Fajar, A., Teresa, A. M., Lubis, A. H., Dewi, A., Purba, D. M., Saudur, I., Siregar, B., & Dionsera, J. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Perusahaan : Kajian Yuridis Putusan Nomor 1967 / Pid . B / 2022 / Pn Mdn Law Enforcement Against Criminal Acts of Embezzlement in Companies : Legal Study of Decision Number 1967 / Pid . B / 2022 / P. 6510–6518.

Gafur, A., Sukmareni, & Munandar, S. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Hubungan Kerja (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 90/Pid.B/2021/PN Bkt). Journal Unes Law Review, Volume 6(Nomor 1), 2302–2311.

Ikram, M., Rahman, S., & Arsy, M. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan. Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 1–15.

Maruba, F., & Hutahaean, P. (2025). Analisis Faktor Psikologi Kriminal Dalam Pengelapan Dana Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Logistik. 3(2), 180–189.

Saputra, F., & Bahreisy, B. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perusahaan yang Diduga Melakukan Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Uang Perusahaan. LocusJournal of Academic Literature Review, 2 Nomor 7(9), 733–741.

Sutopo, S., Soekorini, N., Cornelis, V. I., & Hartoyo, H. (2024). Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan Di Perusahaan Studi Kasus Putusan PN No. 2206/Pid.B/ 2023/PN Sby. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(4), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v3i4.1127

• pdf