Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi

Articles

Vol. 10 No. 7 (2025): Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, ISSN 3025-1311

ETIKA PENGOLAHAN DATA PRIBADI PADA APLIKASI MOBILE: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW 

Submitted
December 8, 2025
Published
2025-12-08

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran komprehensif mengenai etika pengelolaan data pribadi pada aplikasi mobile, khususnya terkait transparansi kebijakan privasi, kepatuhan terhadap regulasi, serta praktik teknis pengumpulan data. Permasalahan utama yang diidentifikasi adalah ketidaksesuaian antara kebijakan privasi dan perilaku aktual aplikasi, penggunaan library pihak ketiga tanpa penjelasan yang memadai, serta lemahnya perlindungan terhadap data sensitif, terutama pada aplikasi kesehatan dan mental health. Untuk mengkaji isu tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengikuti pedoman PRISMA. Proses seleksi menghasilkan sembilan artikel relevan yang kemudian dianalisis secara tematik untuk mengidentifikasi pola, tantangan, dan implikasi etis dalam pengelolaan data pribadi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar aplikasi belum sepenuhnya menerapkan prinsip minimasi data, kejelasan tujuan penggunaan, dan mekanisme persetujuan yang informatif. Selain itu, penggunaan privacy labels belum sepenuhnya mampu mencerminkan praktik pengumpulan data secara akurat. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya peningkatan transparansi, pengawasan lebih ketat terhadap penggunaan pihak ketiga, serta penyelarasan kebijakan privasi dengan standar perlindungan data yang berlaku. Penelitian ini memberikan dasar bagi pengembang, regulator, dan pengguna untuk memahami risiko privasi serta pentingnya praktik pengelolaan data yang lebih etis.

References

  1. Cejas, O. A., Sannier, N., Abualhaija, S., Ceci, M., & Bianculli, D. (2024). GDPR-Relevant Privacy Concerns in Mobile Apps Research: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19142.
  2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19142
  3. Iwaya, L. H., Babar, M. A., Rashid, A., & Wijayarathna, C. (2023). On the Privacy of Mental Health Apps: An Empirical Investigation and Its Implications for App Development. Empirical Software Engineering, 28(1), Art. 2.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10236-0
  5. Jain, A., Rodriguez, D., del Álamo, J. M., & Sadeh, N. (2023). ATLAS: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Privacy Policies and Privacy Labels. Dalam 2023 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW).
  6. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.09247
  7. Lin, X., Wu, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, D., Li, H., & Lin, R. (2025). Quality and Privacy Policy Compliance of Mental Health Care Apps in China: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e66762.
  8. https://doi.org/10.2196/66762
  9. Rodriguez, D., et al. (2025). Privacy Settings of Third-Party Libraries in Android Apps. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2025(2), 180–200.
  10. https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2025-0056
  11. Bhusal, B. (2025). Privacy Nutrition Labels: Promise, Practice, and Paradoxes. Human-Centered Computing.
  12. https://bishnubhusal.com.np/assets/pdf/hcii.pdf
  13. Dellinger, J. C. (2025). Mental Health Apps and Privacy. Dalam Privacy and Data Protection in Mobile Applications (Bab 15). Wiley.
  14. Koch, A., & Wessels, S. (2023). Keeping Privacy Labels Honest. Preprint.
  15. https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2022-0119
  16. Fan, M., Yu, L., Chen, S., Zhou, H., Luo, X., Li, S., Liu, Y., Liu, J., & Liu, T. (2020). An Empirical Evaluation of GDPR Compliance Violations in Android mHealth Apps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05864.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE5003.2020.00032
  18. Baqis, A. M., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2025). Pentingnya Perlindungan dan Keamanan Data Privasi di Era Digital. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(3), 415–425.
  19. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i3.1150
  20. Carrera-Rivera, A., Chami, N., Rivas-Echiz, F., González-Figueroa, J. M., & León-Medina, J. F. (2022). How-to Conduct a Systematic Literature Review: Computer Science and Engineering Applications. Computation, 10(11), 492.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895
  22. Institute for Advanced Study. (2022). Systematic Reviews as a Research Methodology: An Overview. Evidence-Based Pyramid, Karolinska Institutet University Library.
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386136856
  24. Pluto.im. (2025). Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews: Protocols and Best Practices. Insights on Systematic Review Methodology.
  25. https://insights.pluto.im/conducting-systematic-literature-reviews-protocols-and-best-practices/
  26. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, n71.
  27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  28. Scopus. (2022). Creating Search Strategies in Scopus: A Comprehensive Guide. Library Documentation.
  29. Tay, A. (2022). Creating Search Strategies in Scopus to Match Results from a List of Journals. SMU Singapore Library Services, Data Services.
  30. Pretorius, K., Ndaba, S., Ndaba, M., Adeyeye, M., & Raats, M. (2024). A Simple and Systematic Approach to Qualitative Data Extraction and Coding: A Tutorial. Journal of Healthcare Research, e2024-001.
  31. https://doi.org/10.2196/54407
  32. Krippendorff, K. (2011). Computing Krippendorff's Alpha-Reliability. Departmental Papers (ASC), 43, 1–12.
  33. https://www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/2021-03/Computing%20Krippendorff%27s%20Alpha-Reliability.pdf
  34. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, n71.
  35. Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. JBI Global.
  36. Distiller SR. (2023). Quality Assessment Tools for Systematic Reviews: A Comprehensive Overview. Distiller Systematic Review Documentation.
  37. Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  39. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
  40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  41. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  42. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., et al. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. ESRC Methods Programme, Lancaster University.
  43. Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying Heterogeneity in a Meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.
  44. Saka, S., Kaminski, M. E., Martinez-Campos, C., Nagarajappa, S. N., Palchuk, M. B., & Torous, J. (2024). Evaluating Privacy Measures in Healthcare Apps: A Multi-Dimensional Assessment Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal, 4991487.
  45. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4991487
  46. Tangari, G., Bauer, L., West, R., & Cranor, L. F. (2021). Mobile Health and Privacy: Cross-sectional Study of Privacy Practices and Concerns. British Medical Journal, 373, n1248.
  47. JMIR. (2025). Quality and Privacy Policy Compliance of Mental Health Applications: A Systematic Evaluation Framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27(1), e66762.

Similar Articles

71-80 of 430

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.