STUDI PENDAHULUAN DAMPAK PENGUNAAN CHAT GPT TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERFIKIR KRITIS SISWA PADA MATERI JAMUR (Fungi) KELAS X DI SMAN 1 LEBAK WANGI

• Auliya Sari

  Universitas Bina Bangsa

  Author

• Dewi Robiatun Muharomah

  Universitas Bina Bangsa

  Author

• Gigin Ginanjar

  Universitas Bina Bangsa

  Author

The development of artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, presents both opportunities and challenges in biology learning at the secondary school level. This study aims to initially assess the impact of ChatGPT use on students' critical thinking skills in fungi, a class X subject at SMAN 1 Lebak Wangi. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach with biology teachers and class X students as subjects. Data collection was conducted through interviews to obtain a factual picture of ChatGPT utilization patterns, students' understanding of critical thinking, and classroom learning practices regarding fungi. The results show that students' use of ChatGPT is still sporadic and tends to be used as a source of instant answers, especially when working on assignments and evaluations. Meanwhile, students' understanding of critical thinking concepts is still low and has not been fully internalized in the learning process. Teachers do not yet have specific guidelines for integrating ChatGPT use, so its use is not directed to encourage students' scientific analysis, evaluation, and reflection. These findings indicate that without proper pedagogical management, the use of ChatGPT has the potential to hinder the development of critical thinking skills, especially in fungi, which requires conceptual and analytical understanding. Therefore, learning strategies and school policies are needed that can guide the use of AI in a balanced and educational manner.

Perkembangan kecerdasan buatan, khususnya ChatGPT, menghadirkan peluang sekaligus tantangan dalam pembelajaran biologi di tingkat sekolah menengah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara awal dampak penggunaan ChatGPT terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi fungi kelas X di SMAN 1 Lebak Wangi. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan subjek penelitian berupa guru biologi dan siswa kelas X. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara untuk memperoleh gambaran faktual mengenai pola pemanfaatan ChatGPT, pemahaman siswa tentang berpikir kritis, serta praktik pembelajaran materi fungi di kelas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan ChatGPT oleh siswa masih bersifat sporadis dan cenderung dimanfaatkan sebagai sumber jawaban instan, terutama saat mengerjakan tugas dan evaluasi. Sementara itu, pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep berpikir kritis masih rendah dan belum terinternalisasi secara utuh dalam proses pembelajaran. Guru belum memiliki pedoman khusus dalam mengintegrasikan penggunaan ChatGPT, sehingga pemanfaatannya belum diarahkan untuk mendorong analisis, evaluasi, dan refleksi ilmiah siswa. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa tanpa pengelolaan pedagogis yang tepat, penggunaan ChatGPT berpotensi menghambat pengembangan keterampilan berpikir kritis, khususnya pada materi fungi yang menuntut pemahaman konseptual dan analitis. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan strategi pembelajaran dan kebijakan sekolah yang mampu mengarahkan pemanfaatan AI secara seimbang dan edukatif.

1. Auliya Sari, Universitas Bina Bangsa

   Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

   Universitas Bina Bangsa, Serang, Banten

2. Dewi Robiatun Muharomah, Universitas Bina Bangsa

   Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

   Universitas Bina Bangsa, Serang, Banten

3. Gigin Ginanjar, Universitas Bina Bangsa

   Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

   Universitas Bina Bangsa, Serang, Banten

Campbell, N. A., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Orr, R. B. (2020). Biology (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., ... & Metri, B. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promise and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Jamaludin, J., & Romindo, R. (2020). Implementation of combination Vigenere cipher and RSA in hybrid cryptosystem for text security. International Journal of Information Systems and Technology, 4(1), 471–481.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchenhoff, H., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Instruction, 85, 101809.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Laporan penggunaan teknologi digital dalam pendidikan pasca-pandemi. Kemendikbudristek.

King, J. T., & Chatwin, C. J. (2024). AI and the decline of cognitive autonomy in students. Educational Research Review, 41, 100567.

Nguyen, M. T. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT into inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 432–449.

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1–22 https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Rukin. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.

Schmidt, C. O., & Brown, L. S. (2024). AI literacy for teachers: Frameworks for responsible use. Computers & Education, 196, 104721.

Sudarisman, S., Widoretno, S., & Dwiastuti, S. (2021). Critical thinking skills in biology learning. Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 85–93.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing.

Vargo, T. P. (2023). AI and education reform: From automation to augmentation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100130.

Williamson, A. G. (2024). AI-assisted learning: Opportunities and ethical challenges. Computers & Education, 194, 104682.

Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Yuliati, L., & Sigit, D. V. (2022). Biology learning and critical thinking skills: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 1–18 https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1531a.

• pdf